Reach vs. Significance – Impact Assessment Guide For Pillar C: Research Impact (15%), reviewers evaluate case studies based on two distinct but complementary dimensions: Reach and Significance. To achieve a 4* (Outstanding) rating, a submission must demonstrate exceptional performance in both areas. 1. Defining the Dimensions Impact is not measured by the number of research papers published, but by the tangible benefit achieved beyond academia. Dimension Definition Key...

What Counts as “Independent Evidence”? For Pillar C: Research Impact (15%), your claims of real-world benefit must be supported by independent verification. Reviewers will not score a case study based on institutional narrative alone; they require dated, third-party proof that demonstrates a clear causal link between your research and the resulting change. 1. Mandatory Verification Standard Every impact case study must include a list of at least one...

How to Write a 150-Word Output Context Statement For every item submitted under Pillar A: Research Outputs (60%), universities must provide a concise Context Statement (maximum 150 words). This statement is not an abstract; it is a strategic justification that tells reviewers why this specific work represents research excellence. 1. The Three Mandatory Dimensions Your statement must explicitly address these three criteria used by expert panels to determine...